46.2. What is the necessary condition for conducting an examination for alcohol intoxication of a driver at the place where the vehicle is stopped?

UAЯка необхідна умова при огляді на предмет алкогольного сп’яніння водія на місці зупинки транспортного засобу?

The presence of two witnesses and a police officer.UAПрисутність двох свідків та поліцейського.The presence of two witnesses.UAПрисутність двох свідків.The presence of one attesting witness.UAПрисутність одного понятого.The presence of at least two police officers.UAПрисутність щонайменше двох поліцейських.

Question without image

This is an exam question from the Traffic Rules of Ukraine concerning road safety and the legality of actions during the control of drivers for intoxication. Proper documentation of the examination at the place of stopping is important not only for detecting violations, but also for protecting the driver's rights and ensuring the reliability of the test results, which may serve as grounds for liability.

The theoretical exam checks the driver's knowledge of the obligation to comply with lawful police demands (points 2.4 and 2.5 of the traffic rules), as well as the understanding that the examination must be conducted in the prescribed manner. This procedure is detailed in subordinate acts: in particular, the Instruction approved by the Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs No. 1452/735 stipulates that an examination for alcohol intoxication at the place of stopping is conducted in the presence of two witnesses, and this condition is key for the answer to be accepted in the exam ticket.

If we analyze the options, the wording about two witnesses corresponds to the requirement of the Instruction. The option that additionally mentions a police officer may seem logical in everyday understanding, but within the context of the exam question, it is the mandatory condition regarding third-party witnesses that is being tested, while the presence of a police officer is considered obvious, since they are the ones conducting the procedure. Options mentioning one attesting witness or at least two police officers do not reflect the established procedure for examination at the place of stopping, and therefore, in the context of the traffic rules and exam formulations, are incorrect.

The practical meaning of this rule is that two witnesses can confirm the fact of the test, the conditions of the procedure, and the correctness of the data entered into the documents. For the driver, this means more transparency and less risk of disputed situations, and for preparation for the Ukrainian traffic rules exam, a clear guideline: in questions about examination at the place of stopping, the key requirement is precisely the number of witnesses.

Clause 2.4

At the request of a police officer, the driver must stop in compliance with the requirements of these Rules, as well as comply with the lawful demands of the police officer and other persons authorized to regulate road traffic.

Explanation: this clause establishes the driver's obligation to comply with the lawful demands of the police officer, including the requirement to undergo an examination in the prescribed manner.

Clause 2.5

At the request of a police officer, the driver must undergo, in the prescribed manner, a medical examination to determine the state of alcoholic, narcotic, or other intoxication, or being under the influence of medicinal substances that reduce attention and reaction speed.

Explanation: The Traffic Rules directly refer to the “prescribed manner” of conducting the examination; it is within this procedure (defined by subordinate acts) that the condition of the presence of two witnesses is provided for an examination at the place of stop.

That is, the correct answer is "The presence of two witnesses," given that according to the definition of the Traffic Rules, the examination is conducted in the prescribed manner, and the established procedure for examination at the place of stop provides for the presence of two witnesses.

When a police officer at the scene of a stop offers the driver to undergo an alcohol intoxication test using a special technical device (such as a "Drager"), it is important to understand: this procedure must not only be conducted, but also properly documented so that its results can be considered reliable.

To ensure transparency of the test and protect the driver's rights, the regulatory procedure for conducting this action requires the participation of third parties. According to the requirements of the Instruction approved by the Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs dated 09.11.2015 No. 1452/735, the test for intoxication at the scene of the stop is carried out with the mandatory presence of two witnesses. That is, the legislator directly establishes this condition as an element of the correct procedure.

The practical meaning of this requirement is simple. Two witnesses can confirm that the test actually took place, under what conditions it was conducted, that the driver was shown the result, and that the data were entered into the documents without substitution or distortion. For example, if there is a dispute about whether the test was conducted, whether its readings were announced, or whether the documentation procedure was violated, the witnesses serve as an additional guarantee of objectivity.

This question also often involves confusion of terms, but for the exam it is important to remember the wording used in the relevant regulatory act: the procedure at the scene of the stop specifically mentions witnesses (and there must be exactly two of them). This is precisely the requirement the question is aimed at.

Therefore, the correct answer is "The presence of two witnesses.", since the test for alcohol intoxication at the scene of the stop according to the established procedure is conducted only in the presence of two witnesses, which ensures the legality and verifiability of the results.

To use notes, you need to sign up or sign in.

To leave a comment, you need to sign up or sign in.
Loading...