2.14. Does a driver have the right to appeal the actions of a police officer in case of violation of the law by the officer?
UAЧи має право водій оскаржити дії поліцейського в разі порушення ним законодавства?
Question without image
This exam question from the Traffic Rules of Ukraine concerns the rights of a driver when interacting with a police officer and the general legal safety on the road. For the theoretical exam, it is important to understand that the traffic rules regulate not only maneuvers, signs, or priority, but also the procedure for interacting with officials, so that the driver can protect themselves in case of unlawful actions.
The question tests knowledge of the section of the Traffic Rules of Ukraine regarding the duties and rights of the driver, in particular clause 2.14(f), which directly establishes the possibility to appeal the actions of a police officer if they violate the law. In practice, this is also related to clauses 2.14(c) and 2.14(d): the driver has the right to know the reason for the stop and the officer’s details (position, surname), as well as to demand the presentation of an official ID, since without identifying the official, proper appeal is complicated.
The analysis of the answer options comes down to this: the statement about the driver having such a right fully complies with the traffic rules, as this is directly provided for by the Traffic Rules. On the other hand, denying this right contradicts clause 2.14, and is therefore incorrect in the context of the theoretical exam. Knowledge of this provision is also useful in real situations: if the driver disagrees with the actions or the documents issued, they can act in accordance with the law, including appealing the decision within the prescribed time limits.
Clause 2.14 (f) of the Traffic Rules of Ukraine
The driver has the right: “to appeal the actions of a police officer in case of violation of the law by him/her.”
This clause directly establishes the driver’s right to appeal the actions of a police officer if the driver believes that during a stop, document check, inspection, or processing of materials, the requirements of the law were violated.
Clause 2.14 (c) of the Traffic Rules of Ukraine
The driver has the right: “to know the reason for the stop, inspection, and examination of the vehicle by an official of a state body supervising road traffic, as well as his/her surname and position.”
This right is practically necessary for the proper preparation and submission of a complaint/appeal when contesting unlawful actions.
Clause 2.14 (d) of the Traffic Rules of Ukraine
The driver has the right: “to demand that the person supervising road traffic and who stopped the vehicle present his/her identification.”
This ensures the possibility to identify the police officer (official) for the correct appeal of his/her actions in the prescribed manner.
Therefore, the correct answer is “Has the right,” given that according to the definition of the Traffic Rules, the driver is directly granted the right to appeal the actions of a police officer in case of violation of the law by him/her (clause 2.14 (f)).
The Traffic Rules of Ukraine (PDR) explicitly state that a driver not only has obligations but also certain rights when interacting with a police officer. One of these rights concerns situations where an official acts in violation of the law.
Clause 2.14 of the PDR lists the rights of the driver, among which is the right to appeal the actions of a police officer if the officer violates the law. That is, if the driver believes that the stop, inspection, documentation, or other actions were carried out unlawfully, he or she is not required to "simply agree"—the law provides a mechanism for protection.
To make such an appeal possible, the PDR also grants the driver related rights: in particular, to know the reason for the stop and the officer's details (position, surname), as well as to demand the presentation of the officer’s service ID. This information is necessary to properly file a complaint or appeal, since specific actions of a specific official are being contested.
In practice, this might look as follows: a driver is issued a resolution on administrative liability, but does not agree with the grounds or believes that the procedure was violated. In such a case, the driver has the right to appeal the decision and the actions of the police officer in the prescribed manner, including within the time limits established by law.
Therefore, the correct answer is "Has the right," since the Traffic Rules of Ukraine (clause 2.14) explicitly grant the driver the right to appeal the actions of a police officer in case the officer violates the law.